View Single Post
      08-10-2011, 02:42 PM   #9
The1
Major General
Canada
76
Rep
5,114
Posts

Drives: white 135
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: KW ontario/vancouver temporarily

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by mtecnic View Post
ok, i've been balls deep in research trying to figure out what to buy. I can go with couple gen old stuff for 500 like a Nikon D80. Then there is the newer stuff for about 500.

The big questions I have:
Is the guide mode on the Nikon d3000 and d3100 really going to be helpful for very long?

Is the lack of a focus motor in some of the lower end stuff a big deal? Is it going to piss me off later? I'm not sure how this effects the experience.

Will I notice much a difference in image quality with 1-2 generation older stuff like the d3000 or d60-70-80 ?

Thanks!
Nic
The guide is pretty handy to have, it's like having your own teacher standing beside you while you're out taking pictures. That being said, it's just a guide, and there's a lot to learn out there beyond just how to set up the camera for a shot, things like composition you learn on your own.

by focusing motor i assume you mean autofocus? that would be purely subjective if it's something that will bug you in the long run or not. Digital SLRs don't have a focusing screen that woud have been used on older cameras that took the lenses without autofocus, so it can be hard to manually focus it as a result. I would stick with auto-focus lenses to make life easier.

There is a difference in image quality over the years, and their always will be, but it depends what your goals are. if you're printing 4x6 images, you'd be fine with 3 megapixels. if you're looking to make posters, that won't be capable of doing that to the same extent as say, 12 megapixels or more.

some of the older generations from 5-7 years ago are still being used by professionals, they are very capable, but the focusing systems in them are a bit dated, and some other features of the newer stuff doesn't exist. Low light sensitivity will be sacrificed along with better autofocus.

you really have to assess what you want and need.

and to your friend who says his P&S camera will shoot a better shot then a DSLR, he's 100% correct. As long as the person with the DSLR has never used one before. The colour depth, the light sensitivity, and the amount of information in a single DSLR image is on a completely different level. but you have to know how to make the most out of it, if you're putting the DSLR in automatic, and shooting only in jpeg format, you're not going to get the results you want.

if you're ready for the challenge, grab a DSLR, if you want a really good point and shoot, get a Canon S-95 or used S-90, they are as close as you can get to a DSLR without actually having one. And they still pale in comparison.
Appreciate 0