View Single Post
      07-17-2017, 02:59 PM   #94
Viffermike
Colonel
Viffermike's Avatar
United_States
1714
Rep
2,935
Posts

Drives: '18 black-n-blue 718 Cayman
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Big D

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Obioban View Post
Because that sounds to me like a silly (and completely unrealistic) standard. How about "vastly safer than a human driver". If so, they're already there.
Which begs this question every time AVs come up for me:

Who, or what, will be liable for those errors?

That is the big hurdle. It's easy to blame human error for most accidents -- and the ones that aren't usually get settled or litigated.

But when humans are removed from that in an AV, who is liable? The carmaker? The software designer? The government? An element of the environment the error occurred in? Maybe even fate/God/[insert deity here]?

It's a huge gray area that no one has been able to define. Huge. Huuuuuuuge. And AVs used en masse won't become reality until someone either assumes liability or sets up a mechanism to determine liability with both consistency and an insurance component.
__________________
--Life is a journey made more exciting with a fast car.--
--Helmets are for closers.--
<<Current: "Blackened" '18 NBM Porsche 718 Cayman ... Gone (but not forgotten): "Blackened" MG '15 228i M Sport w/aFe filter/scoop, Hertz drivers, P3Cars multigauge, other goodies>>