View Single Post
      07-05-2018, 01:10 PM   #38
bradleyland
TIM YOYO
United_States
1413
Rep
3,262
Posts

Drives: 2013 M3
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Vero Beach, FL

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkDemma View Post
It's true that there is an imbalance here, the US imposes a 2.5% tariff on cars coming from the EU while there is a 10% tariff the other way. The question should be whether getting the EU to lower this rate would make a difference in sales of American cars in Europe.

This is highly doubtful that it would make much of an impact. With fuel prices much higher in the EU, smaller cars / engines are what sell. American car makers are moving to all but abandon selling cars at all, moving towards SUVs and trucks with larger engines and lower fuel economy. There is a niche market for things like the Mustang, but for folks that really want one and can afford a gas guzzling V8 muscle car, the extra 7.5% doesn't really matter one way or another to them.

So while technically yes there is a tariff imbalance here, and it FEELS like hey we should do something about it, the reality of it is that even if expending all this political capital and good will with our closest allies gets the concessions asked for, it won't really do much or anything to help American car manufacturers. The real proof here is that THEY aren't asking for it, in fact they are asking for them to STOP trying. If there was any way that this approach was likely to benefit US automobile manufacturers, don't you think they would be lobbying FOR it rather than against? They have done the analysis and believe it will be ultimately harmful to them, which begs the question - why are we taking this approach?
If the EU tariffs on American imports are so ineffective, then the EU shouldn't have any problem repealing them.

Problem solved.
__________________
His: 2013 ///M3 - Interlagos Blue Black M-DCT
Hers: 2013 X3 28i - N20 Mineral Silver / Sand Beige / Premium, Tech
Past: 2010 135i - TiAg Coral Red 6MT ///M-Sport