View Single Post
      06-20-2021, 11:23 AM   #11
GuidoK
#buildnotbought
GuidoK's Avatar
10855
Rep
4,893
Posts

Drives: Z4 3.0i ESS TS2+
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Tinkering in the garage

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Bread View Post
Except rotaries are extremely efficient at steady rpm. It's actually nearly ideal as a range extender.
I don't know.
Afaik compression rings (well, not rings of course but seals or whatever you call it) show lots of loss and they burn oil (not a good trait for a clean car)

I've never seen a fuel efficient rotary car. Also not on highway miles.
If you compare their latest efford (rx8) to say an equivalent BMW (for instance a z4 with 3L i6 from the same era; similar weight and power) the bmw is so much more fuel efficient. Both in norm mileage as in real user data (bmw Z4: 9,5L/100km RX8: 13,4L/100km. This is based on real world data of ~300-400cars of both brands and probably tens of thousands of fill ups (spritmonitor)

But if any brand can pull it off, it's for sure Mazda.
But I don't think that platform is going to make it.
__________________
Z4 3.0i | ESS TS2+ supercharger | Quaife ATB LSD | Brembo/BMW performance BBK front/rear | Schrick FI cams | Schmiedmann headers+cats | Powerflex/strongflex PU bushings | Vibra-technics engine mounts | H&R anti rollbars | KW V3 coilovers/KW camber plates | Sachs race engineering clutch | tons of custom sh#t

Last edited by GuidoK; 06-20-2021 at 11:37 AM..
Appreciate 0