Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Blob
Those low light photos turned out pretty good only because of the f1.8 lenses. It would look different if it was a f2.8. Because the focus range is so short, you wouldn't need any L lenses for great results.
|
Not true. I shoot 2.8, 4 and up to f/8 for low light work on any lens. The samples were using a non-L and high ISO as an example of its ISO handling, not lens capability.
The only thing the differentiates photos from a 1.8 to a 2.8 is depth which is not what im trying to show in these photos. The comparison here is between a 5D classic and a II. Im showing the poster that how well the 5D classic still performs.