BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Today's Posts
BIMMERPOST Universal Forums General Automotive (non-BMW) Talk + Photos/Videos GTI (MKV) vs. 330i (E90)

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      02-13-2007, 11:36 PM   #1
ChineseGuy
QuickShifter
ChineseGuy's Avatar
137
Rep
1,500
Posts

Drives: Black E90
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: North Pole

iTrader: (2)

GTI (MKV) vs. 330i (E90)

which one is faster do you think?

stock vs. stock

i was in the GTI forum and got into an arguement for those members, mainly becuase they beleive the GTI is faster...

i tried to explain to them and they come up with some 0-60 times that even i haven't seen before, someone said it hits 60 in 6 sec flat....haha

now even i'm confused...

personally i own both the cars, and i can tell the 330 is faster

but i just needed some comments about this....
Appreciate 0
      02-13-2007, 11:49 PM   #2
canucklion
pull my finger to get your kinder® surprise
canucklion's Avatar
Canada
148
Rep
10,455
Posts

Drives: circles around you
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada

iTrader: (9)

why dont' you get one of your friends/family to race you? you drive the 330i in one race, then GTI the next, to rule out any driver variability
__________________
Appreciate 0
      02-14-2007, 12:13 AM   #3
shipill
Major
Canada
412
Rep
1,287
Posts

Drives: Macan S
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Canada

iTrader: (7)

I drove both , 330 is faster .
Appreciate 0
      02-14-2007, 05:04 AM   #4
NFS
Major General
NFS's Avatar
United Kingdom
275
Rep
9,218
Posts

Drives: M340i
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: UK

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChineseGuy View Post
which one is faster do you think?

stock vs. stock

i was in the GTI forum and got into an arguement for those members, mainly becuase they beleive the GTI is faster...

i tried to explain to them and they come up with some 0-60 times that even i haven't seen before, someone said it hits 60 in 6 sec flat....haha

now even i'm confused...

personally i own both the cars, and i can tell the 330 is faster

but i just needed some comments about this....
The 330i is faster - both in a straight line and on a track



These are EVO Magazine test lap times for the West Circuit at Bedford Autodrome in the UK.

BMW 330i msport = 1.30.00
(Mark V) VW Golf R32 = 1.32.55
(Mark V) VW Golf GTi = 1.33.75

The GTi does remarkably well though and pretty much makes the r32 redundant.

The standard GTI takes 7.2 secs to reach 62 mph which improves to 6.9 secs with DSG.

The 330i gets there in 6.3 secs.

Case closed
Appreciate 0
      02-14-2007, 06:06 AM   #5
canucklion
pull my finger to get your kinder® surprise
canucklion's Avatar
Canada
148
Rep
10,455
Posts

Drives: circles around you
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada

iTrader: (9)

^ there you go CHineseguy, post that in the GTI forum
__________________
Appreciate 0
      02-14-2007, 06:56 AM   #6
imolazhp_ci
Major
29
Rep
1,002
Posts

Drives: Z4 M Coupe
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: orange county

iTrader: (0)

the new DSG MKV's do get to 60 in right about 6 flat. up to 6.3 though. they have launch control and pretty impressive. i'd say the 0-60 would be about even...all things considered, but as speeds increased the 330i would start to walk on it hard, turbo cars inherently have a very poor top end. at least comparatively.
Appreciate 0
      02-14-2007, 11:00 AM   #7
porksoda
Enlisted Member
0
Rep
43
Posts

Drives: 530i
Join Date: May 2006
Location: GTA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by needforspeed View Post
The 330i is faster - both in a straight line and on a track

These are EVO Magazine test lap times for the West Circuit at Bedford Autodrome in the UK.

BMW 330i msport = 1.30.00
(Mark V) VW Golf R32 = 1.32.55
(Mark V) VW Golf GTi = 1.33.75

The GTi does remarkably well though and pretty much makes the r32 redundant.

The standard GTI takes 7.2 secs to reach 62 mph which improves to 6.9 secs with DSG.

The 330i gets there in 6.3 secs.

Case closed

Thats a MKIV R32. not MKV.
Appreciate 0
      02-14-2007, 11:34 AM   #8
NFS
Major General
NFS's Avatar
United Kingdom
275
Rep
9,218
Posts

Drives: M340i
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: UK

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by porksoda View Post
Thats a MKIV R32. not MKV.
You could be right ...

Anyway the GTi is definitely the Mark V

EDIT ... just checked the latest edition of EVO and I'm pretty certain the R32 time is for the current model.

They have tested both - since the mark iv version was discontinued in 04 I think it's unlikely that they would still post the time for the old car. Especially as it is flagged as the 'best in class'.

I should point out that this is a REALLY flattering lap time for the 330i. That's why I like it

Last edited by NFS; 02-14-2007 at 12:43 PM..
Appreciate 0
      02-14-2007, 02:26 PM   #9
porksoda
Enlisted Member
0
Rep
43
Posts

Drives: 530i
Join Date: May 2006
Location: GTA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by needforspeed View Post
You could be right ...

Anyway the GTi is definitely the Mark V

EDIT ... just checked the latest edition of EVO and I'm pretty certain the R32 time is for the current model.

They have tested both - since the mark iv version was discontinued in 04 I think it's unlikely that they would still post the time for the old car. Especially as it is flagged as the 'best in class'.

I should point out that this is a REALLY flattering lap time for the 330i. That's why I like it
Reason being since on the scan you posted it doesnt say R32 V whereas it does for GTI

Also the R32 isnt wasnt avail for tests of sorts yet or maybe now but not a month ago.
Appreciate 0
      02-14-2007, 03:21 PM   #10
bavarian19
General
bavarian19's Avatar
United_States
517
Rep
18,858
Posts

Drives: Car
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: VA

iTrader: (23)

Let your friends talk all they want. They are just trying to tear you down for buying a better car.

... and really... who cares that much???
Appreciate 0
      02-14-2007, 03:39 PM   #11
just4kickz
boku no namae ha...
United_States
336
Rep
11,025
Posts

Drives: 2006 BS 330i
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: S. Bay Area, CA + Newark, NJ + ChiCity + True Blue

iTrader: (11)

Garage List
2006 E90 330i  [0.00]
haha reminds me of the 350z forum... online arguments of which car is faster/better...
__________________
looking for a PreLCI Black Sapphire e90 front bumper without license plate holes

"Akimbo shotguns. Broken wrists anyone? And don't give me that 'it's just a game' bull****. Where the **** are my akimbo interventions then?! One scope on each eye mother****er!!"
Appreciate 0
      02-14-2007, 03:42 PM   #12
NFS
Major General
NFS's Avatar
United Kingdom
275
Rep
9,218
Posts

Drives: M340i
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: UK

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by porksoda View Post
Reason being since on the scan you posted it doesnt say R32 V whereas it does for GTI

Also the R32 isnt wasnt avail for tests of sorts yet or maybe now but not a month ago.
EVO have a long term Mk V R32 on their fleet at the moment. It's been on sale in the UK since Nov 05.
Appreciate 0
      02-14-2007, 04:23 PM   #13
porksoda
Enlisted Member
0
Rep
43
Posts

Drives: 530i
Join Date: May 2006
Location: GTA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by needforspeed View Post
EVO have a long term Mk V R32 on their fleet at the moment. It's been on sale in the UK since Nov 05.
ah didnt realise it was an uk publication.

well the r32 is a big dissapointment as the new one @ 250hp is just not what it should have been .... 300 is where they shoudl have taken it or atleast 275.

Well everyone is gonnna say thier car is better. 330i is one of the finer pieces of machinery.
Appreciate 0
      02-14-2007, 05:18 PM   #14
NFS
Major General
NFS's Avatar
United Kingdom
275
Rep
9,218
Posts

Drives: M340i
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: UK

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by porksoda View Post
ah didnt realise it was an uk publication.

well the r32 is a big dissapointment as the new one @ 250hp is just not what it should have been .... 300 is where they shoudl have taken it or atleast 275.

Well everyone is gonnna say thier car is better. 330i is one of the finer pieces of machinery.
The r32 was on my shopping list - as was the GTi.

In the end the 330i won out - I have a RWD thing.
Appreciate 0
      02-14-2007, 09:10 PM   #15
ChineseGuy
QuickShifter
ChineseGuy's Avatar
137
Rep
1,500
Posts

Drives: Black E90
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: North Pole

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by canucklion View Post
^ there you go CHineseguy, post that in the GTI forum
i DID post that, strangely, no one replyed to that yet
Appreciate 0
      02-14-2007, 10:16 PM   #16
DFW_M
Major General
1671
Rep
6,587
Posts

Drives: Macan GTS
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Dallas, TX

iTrader: (4)

325/8 is faster than the GTI (2.0T).
R32 is a different story...
Appreciate 0
      02-14-2007, 10:18 PM   #17
ChineseGuy
QuickShifter
ChineseGuy's Avatar
137
Rep
1,500
Posts

Drives: Black E90
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: North Pole

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by dr325i View Post
325/8 is faster than the GTI (2.0T).
R32 is a different story...
i think 328 is faster, but 325 too?
Appreciate 0
      02-14-2007, 10:19 PM   #18
DFW_M
Major General
1671
Rep
6,587
Posts

Drives: Macan GTS
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Dallas, TX

iTrader: (4)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChineseGuy View Post
i think 328 is faster, but 325 too?
now you think that 15 extra horses make 328 really that faster than 325...maybe 0.1 sec 0-60 and 0.2 sec 1/4...
Appreciate 0
      02-14-2007, 11:22 PM   #19
Zeiss
Lieutenant Colonel
Zeiss's Avatar
No_Country
341
Rep
1,864
Posts

Drives: Bicycle
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Vancouver

iTrader: (0)

abit

HOW IS THE CLS 55AMG SLOWER THEN THE POLO GTI? AM I MISSING SOMETHING? also boxter S faster than murcielago? ?
Appreciate 0
      02-15-2007, 01:36 AM   #20
imolazhp_ci
Major
29
Rep
1,002
Posts

Drives: Z4 M Coupe
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: orange county

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by BNR32 View Post
abit

HOW IS THE CLS 55AMG SLOWER THEN THE POLO GTI? AM I MISSING SOMETHING? also boxter S faster than murcielago? ?
to answer the first question... because it's a mercedes. to answer the second, the boxster handles great and the murcielago is 4wd which handles poorly on a track.
Appreciate 0
      02-15-2007, 03:20 AM   #21
ChineseGuy
QuickShifter
ChineseGuy's Avatar
137
Rep
1,500
Posts

Drives: Black E90
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: North Pole

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by dr325i View Post
now you think that 15 extra horses make 328 really that faster than 325...maybe 0.1 sec 0-60 and 0.2 sec 1/4...
according to the 0-60 from bmw, 328 gets almost the same 0-60 times as the 330
Appreciate 0
      02-15-2007, 03:35 AM   #22
Zeiss
Lieutenant Colonel
Zeiss's Avatar
No_Country
341
Rep
1,864
Posts

Drives: Bicycle
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Vancouver

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by imolazhp_ci View Post
to answer the first question... because it's a mercedes. to answer the second, the boxster handles great and the murcielago is 4wd which handles poorly on a track.
If you've driven the car you would'nt be saying that . That still makes no sense, a mini faster then a SL55 AMG? Someone get some pictures of this track, i'm dieing to see




0700700 CODE RED MATE!
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:41 AM.




bmw
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST