[hooligan_COLD]

Originally Posted by adc100

He took hunter over to China and Ukraine several times on Air Force 2. Did he meet with Burishma and his china contacts on these flight? I don't know and neither do you.

I hope Warren asks about it tonite.

"He" being Hunter or Joe?

Family accompanying politicians on overseas trips is not really unheard of, so I'm not sure what you're driving at there.

[MKSixer]

Originally Posted by schoy

Trump is the de facto head of the DOJ (via the Attorney General). Now knowing that, ask yourself why there isn’t an official investigation going on. The answer’s pretty obvious ...

Please list every investigation currently going on in the DOJ. I will wait.

[Captain Blood]

Originally Posted by MKSixer

Please list every investigation currently going on in the DOJ. I will wait.

Apparently nothing against Hillary.

[anglo]

Originally Posted by hooligan_COLD

It. Was. Official. US. Foreign. Policy.

It was done 100% in the open. For all to see. Joe has certainly made no secret of it since then.

Most/all of the G7 countries AND the International Monetary Fund wanted Shokin gone. Why? Because he wasn't actually investigating corruption.

If this was Joe doing his son a favor, that's even more reason to elect him because he seems to be able to bend all of Western Europe to his will.

What did China get in return for their investment in Paradigm? If this is such a no-brainer, the list should be long and easily identified. Right?

Let me guess, you got your rebuke from the Liberal Media!

There's just one problem.

"Hundreds of pages of never-released memos and documents - many from inside the American team helping Burisma to stave off its legal troubles - conflict with Biden's narrative.



And they raise the troubling prospect that U.S. officials may have painted a false picture in Ukraine that helped ease Burisma's legal troubles and stop prosecutors' plans to interview Hunter Biden during the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

For instance, Burisma's American legal representatives met with Ukrainian officials just days after Biden forced the firing of the country's chief prosecutor and offered "an apology for dissemination of false information by U.S. representatives and public figures" about the Ukrainian prosecutors, according to the Ukrainian government's official memo of the meeting. The effort to secure that meeting began the same day the prosecutor's firing was announced. "

https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign...-ukraine-story

Coruption at Burisma was being investigated by Shokin

[hooligan_COLD]

Originally Posted by anglo

Let me guess, you got your rebuke from the Liberal Media!

There's just one problem.

"Hundreds of pages of never-released memos and documents - many from inside the American team helping Burisma to stave off its legal troubles - conflict with Biden's narrative.



And they raise the troubling prospect that U.S. officials may have painted a false picture in Ukraine that helped ease Burisma's legal troubles and stop prosecutors' plans to interview Hunter Biden during the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

For instance, Burisma's American legal representatives met with Ukrainian officials just days after Biden forced the firing of the country's chief prosecutor and offered "an apology for dissemination of false information by U.S. representatives and public figures" about the Ukrainian prosecutors, according to the Ukrainian government's official memo of the meeting. The effort to secure that meeting began the same day the prosecutor's firing was announced. "

https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign...-ukraine-story

Coruption at Burisma was being investigated by Shokin

You're going to have to do better than an op/ed by Solomon. Sorry.

[glennQNYC]

Originally Posted by MKSixer

Please list every investigation currently going on in the DOJ. I will wait.

Thank you. This is the point I've been making in the Impeachment thread. We don't know what the DoJ is investigating. They don't put out press releases when they commence an investigation!

[glennQNYC]

What I'm disgusted by are the dummies parroting "there's no evidence of wrongdoing" or even worse, "nobody is accusing the Bidens of any wrongdoing." While we can say there hasn't been PROOF, there is EVIDENCE of wrongdoing... and valid or not, everyone should be able to agree that people are accusing the Bidens of wrongdoing.

[hooligan_COLD]

Originally Posted by glennQNYC

What I'm disgusted by are the dummies parroting "there's no evidence of wrongdoing" or even worse, "nobody is accusing the Bidens of any wrongdoing." While we can say there hasn't been PROOF, there is EVIDENCE of wrongdoing... and valid or not, everyone should be able to agree that people are accusing the Bidens of wrongdoing.

What is that evidence?

[anglo]

Originally Posted by hooligan_COLD

You're going to have to do better than an op/ed by Solomon. Sorry.

You can do better than , My boy didn't do nuffin argument.

[glennQNYC]

Originally Posted by hooligan_COLD

What is that evidence?

As a broad concept... Are you really saying you haven't seen any facts that warrant an investigation by our DoJ?

[hooligan_COLD]

Originally Posted by glennQNYC

As a broad concept... Are you really saying you haven't seen any facts that warrant an investigation by our DoJ?

Answer my question and I'll answer yours.

What evidence do you see of Joe Biden abusing his power as VP or other wrongdoing?

[hooligan_COLD]

Originally Posted by anglo

You can do better than , My boy didn't do nuffin argument.

I can, but I don't need to. Burden of proof falls on the claimant.

[glennQNYC]

Originally Posted by hooligan_COLD

Answer my question and I'll answer yours.

What evidence do you see of Joe Biden abusing his power as VP or other wrongdoing?

Without getting into detail; I see more evidence than what authorized surveilling American citizens involved in a rival political campaign. That says it all. I'm working off of the principles established during the last administration.

[hooligan_COLD]

Originally Posted by glennQNYC

Without getting into detail; I see more evidence than what authorized surveilling American citizens involved in a rival political campaign. That says it all. I'm working off of the principles established during the last administration.

That's my question - what evidence do you see?

[glennQNYC]

Originally Posted by hooligan_COLD

That's my question - what evidence do you see?

Are you not able to discuss broad concepts? For both time and expediency I'm trying to discuss the topic generally instead of engaging in the specific details.

Democracy dies in the darkness is a timely phrase these days. What's the objection to shining a light on the appearance of impropriety? It involves Democrats?

[hooligan_COLD]

Originally Posted by glennQNYC

Are you not able to discuss broad concepts? For both time and expediency I'm trying to discuss the topic generally instead of engaging in the specific details.

Democracy dies in the darkness is a timely phrase these days. What's the objection to shining a light on the appearance of impropriety? It involves Democrats?

Sure, discuss the evidence broadly, if you like. I'm not asking to get into the weeds.

You claim you see evidence, not just bad optics. What is that evidence? Shokin's removal? Hunter flying to China on Air Force 2? What?

I don't understand your reticence here and without at least identifying which actions you view as evidence, I don't see how we can actually have a discussion.

[Captain Blood]

Originally Posted by hooligan_COLD

Sure, discuss the evidence broadly, if you like. I'm not asking to get into the weeds.

You claim you see evidence, not just bad optics. What is that evidence? Shokin's removal? Hunter flying to China on Air Force 2? What?

I don't understand your reticence here and without at least identifying which actions you view as evidence, I don't see how we can actually have a discussion.

Your :is getting a lot of work lately.........

[adc100]

Originally Posted by hooligan_COLD

Sure, discuss the evidence broadly, if you like. I'm not asking to get into the weeds.

Even evidence is no proof of guilt or Innocent. Biden will likely be convicted in the Public Courtroom because of circumstantial "evidence": He hopped on Airforce 2 to both China and Ukraine. He knew knothing about the gas industry yet got a lucrative job on the board and walked away from china with saddlebags of money. He is on camera saying there would be no quid-pro unless the guy investigating his son was fired. You can bet there will be more-much more evidence as things unravel for Uncle Joe and his young girl loving ways.

Joe said they never discussed the gas company yet is on a picture with a Company rep and his son. No "evidence" right? But you would have to have an IQ of less than 80 not to connect the dots.

I know you have to have an IQ higher than 80 but why you are asking for details of evidence that a drunken sailor can see is curious.

[hooligan_COLD]

Originally Posted by adc100

Even evidence is no proof of guilt or Innocent. Biden will likely be convicted in the Public Courtroom because of circumstantial "evidence": He hopped on Airforce 2 to both China and Ukraine. He knew knothing about the gas industry yet got a lucrative job on the board and walked away from china with saddlebags of money. He is on camera saying there would be no quid-pro unless the guy investigating his son was fired. You can bet there will be more-much more evidence as things unravel for Uncle Joe and his young girl loving ways.

Again, the direct family members of the rich and powerful getting positions they are wholly unqualified for is not out of the ordinary - look no further than Jared being put in charge of the Middle East negotiations for evidence of that.

Hunter getting a job is not evidence of any wrongdoing by Joe.

Just like Don Jr. having his picture taken with those two Ukrainians that got arrested isn't evidence of him or his daddy doing anything wrong, per se.

Originally Posted by adc100

Joe said they never discussed the gas company yet is on a picture with a Company rep and his son. No "evidence" right? But you would have to have an IQ of less than 80 not to connect the dots.

I've taken pictures with lots of people I've never discussed business with.

Originally Posted by adc100

I know you have to have an IQ higher than 80 but why you are asking for details of evidence that a drunken sailor can see is curious.

You're seeing evidence where there isn't any, frankly.

[hooligan_COLD]

Originally Posted by adc100

Even evidence is no proof of guilt or Innocent. Biden will likely be convicted in the Public Courtroom because of circumstantial "evidence": He hopped on Airforce 2 to both China and Ukraine. He knew knothing about the gas industry yet got a lucrative job on the board and walked away from china with saddlebags of money. He is on camera saying there would be no quid-pro unless the guy investigating his son was fired. You can bet there will be more-much more evidence as things unravel for Uncle Joe and his young girl loving ways.

Joe said they never discussed the gas company yet is on a picture with a Company rep and his son. No "evidence" right? But you would have to have an IQ of less than 80 not to connect the dots.

I know you have to have an IQ higher than 80 but why you are asking for details of evidence that a drunken sailor can see is curious.

Speaking of people being in pictures with politicians.....

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/muckra...rt-in-new-york

[anglo]

Originally Posted by hooligan_COLD

Again, the direct family members of the rich and powerful getting positions they are wholly unqualified for is not out of the ordinary - look no further than Jared being put in charge of the Middle East negotiations for evidence of that.

Hunter getting a job is not evidence of any wrongdoing by Joe.

Just like Don Jr. having his picture taken with those two Ukrainians that got arrested isn't evidence of him or his daddy doing anything wrong, per se.




I've taken pictures with lots of people I've never discussed business with.




You're seeing evidence where there isn't any, frankly.

Jared is not making money working at the White House, he got the job because Trump trusts his judgment, he's a bright guy!
Not a drug addict!

Jared took a pay cut, these arent the career politicians you're used to.

Trump represents what the founding fathers wanted. Citizen statesmen. Most of the founding fathers were rich before they got into politics.

The Bidens made millions selling influence to the Chinese and Ukrainians!

[anglo]