[JCtx]

Originally Posted by JB135MDCT

there is nothing we can say to change your mind, even your own poll can't do it.

. Worthless arguing with a 'fanboy' . Signing off.

[BrokenVert]

Originally Posted by elp_jc

. Worthless arguing with a 'fanboy' . Signing off.

I'm not fanatical fanboy as I love F1 just as much as I love lms. It's simply I believe in something and I fight for what I believe in.

And a worthless fanboy doesn't bring valid points to his arguments as I have. Please in the future don't insult me by being so ignorant as to call somebody with a differing opinion a fanboy inorder to simply discredit their opinion, which is just as credible as any F1 or WRC fans opinion as a fan of that sport

[Evice]

Originally Posted by JB135MDCT

BV, Since you have succumbed to F1 being more advanced technically, you should start a new poll as to who is the most capable/technical driver. Don't forget to add WRC & MotoGP.

On this topic, I say it is WRC drivers as they are not only driving on all weather conditions, they are driving on all different surfaces.

[BrokenVert]

I know I'm stoking this fire but on my poll page it's currently 26-8 F1 vs LMS viewers. Its no wonder that I lost this debate. You guys don't even like LMS to begin with

[Poleposition]

Untrue. I love ALMS. Its just not as advanced as F1

[JB135MDCT]

Originally Posted by Poleposition

Untrue. I love ALMS. Its just not as advanced as F1

^+1

[TK-421]

Originally Posted by BrokenVert

I know I'm stoking this fire but on my poll page it's currently 26-8 F1 vs LMS viewers. Its no wonder that I lost this debate. You guys don't even like LMS to begin with

Wow... seriously? Did you know that it's possible for some people to like F1 and LMS at the same time? It's a crazy thought, believe me I know, but I happen to be one of those people. I watch both as much as possible and believe F1 is more advanced by far but that doesn't necessarily mean I like it more.

[BrokenVert]

Wow even I put an emmoticon you guys don't get a joke. Lol I know I lost lighten up

[JB135MDCT]

Originally Posted by BrokenVert

Wow even I put an emmoticon you guys don't get a joke. Lol I know I lost lighten up

F1 is serious man.

[MontegoblueE92]

Just found this online. This should be enough to convince BrokenVert.

http://www.f1-forecast.com/pdf/F1%20...ersion%205.pdf

[JB135MDCT]

Originally Posted by MontegoblueE92

Just found this online. This should be enough to convince BrokenVert.

http://www.f1-forecast.com/pdf/F1%20...ersion%205.pdf

Monte, Nice find.

[BrokenVert]

Originally Posted by MontegoblueE92

Just found this online. This should be enough to convince BrokenVert.

http://www.f1-forecast.com/pdf/F1%20...ersion%205.pdf

Im not going to deny that F1 cars incredible thinkers designing the aerodynamics of a car but to be an advanced racing series requires advanced thinking in more than just aerodynamically integrating all components of a car.

It was a really nice read tho.

[xbook]

Originally Posted by MontegoblueE92

Just found this online. This should be enough to convince BrokenVert.

http://www.f1-forecast.com/pdf/F1%20...ersion%205.pdf

Oooooh, that's some fun reading, thanks for posting

Amazing how detailed their tech writing is.

[michaelthepsycho]

Formula 1 no doubt. Technological advance and reliability are usually inversely related. As stuff gets more complex and complicated, it tends to be more fragile. Look at how easy it is to break a modern phone now. Whereas you can trash a brick-sized walkie-talkie and it would still work.

I think making the argument about reliability as a sign of technology is invalid. LMS have some parts where top speed is higher than F1 but F1 is the pinnacle of acceleration.