E90Post
 


Studio RSR
 
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum > E90 / E92 / E93 3-series Technical Forums > Suspension | Brakes | Chassis > H&R Sport vs B&G S2 on non-sport suspension



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      12-24-2010, 02:22 PM   #1
LLinxuS
First Lieutenant
LLinxuS's Avatar
56
Rep
392
Posts

Drives: 2017 Tacoma TRD Pro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Pasadena, CA

iTrader: (1)

Garage List
2007 328i e90  [9.28]
H&R Sport vs B&G S2 on non-sport suspension

I'm really torn between the two for a couple of reasons.

The B&G claims to go a little lower than the H&R, and the vendor really vouches that it rides better, but I'm a little skeptical after seeing this thread...

http://www.e90post.com/forums/showth...ighlight=B%26G

He lowered the car on B&G but it still looks like stock suspension and looks horrible IMO.

In other threads, the vendors claim that it is a much better ride on the B&G vs. the H&R and that the B&G is safer on the stock suspension.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tom @ eas
After installing the B&Gs, we won't be using H&R springs again. Most M3s that come through the shop choose the B&Gs or Eibachs.

The H&Rs are very stiff.
Can anyone chime in that is not trying to make some final Q4 sales? haha

Thanks and Happy Holidays!

Last edited by LLinxuS; 12-24-2010 at 02:30 PM..
Appreciate 0
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:45 AM.




e90post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST